Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Luna Digital | May 22, 2013

Scroll to top

Top

10 Comments

Rann's Latest Ban: Alcohol in Nightclubs & Pubs

The Rann Government is at it again.

Following the grossly unpopular attempts at curfews, alcohol taxes (federal government perhaps, but even so), cordoning off streets and increasing police patrols, the apparently super-conservative state government has just announced plans to ban alcohol consumption from 4-7 a.m. in licensed venues South Australia-wide.

The casino is the only exception to the rule.

“The casino should be able to trade 24 hours a day if that suits their business model, but … there is a moral obligation on the Government to be fair on other traders,” Ian Horne, Australian Hotels Association Chief Executive Officer, said.

“The casino has 985 poker machines, it is the biggest pub in town … maybe the Government was too scared to take them on.”

He added that the casino’s exemption was ‘offensive’ to other city traders.

Gail Gago, Consumer Affairs Minister, explained that the introduction will include more managed taxi ranks, four new inspectors and an education campaign, at a cost of $1.4 million upfront and then $750,000 a year to maintain.

Four new inspectors will go a long way at managing the thousands of club-goers who pour into the streets once the drinks stop flowing.

The question needs to be asked why the Government is so set on controlling Adelaide’s nightlife, when it in fact, rowdiness doesn’t appear to be such a heavy set issue upon a casual stroll down Hindley Street.

Don’t get us wrong- we’re not saying that there is no issue. Just that the Government’s reaction isn’t directly proportionate to the magnitude of the issue.

The implementation of these regulations is one which would hardly be permanent, as they realise that forcing club-goers from the venues in masses will create more havoc than it prevents.

Rann’s running out… good luck at the next re-election.

  • http://twitter.com/lunamagazine Luna Magazine

    Unbiased journalism at its best.

    • http://twitter.com/kiddasean Kidda Sean

      hahaha my bad.
      i’m not a journalist, nor did i think we’d be aimed at being unbiased for something like this- i think the nature of luna suggests we’d be against this sort of legislation!

    • http://twitter.com/kiddasean Kidda Sean

      hahaha my bad.
      i’m not a journalist, nor did i think we’d be aimed at being unbiased for something like this- i think the nature of luna suggests we’d be against this sort of legislation!

  • Walter

    Last year two of my friends were unprovokedly bashed (and hospitalised) in unrelated incidents (one on Hindley, one on Rundle) within a fortnight of each other.

    I think rowdiness is still an issue for the ‘nightlife’ crowd.

    But yeah, exempting the Casino is weird, that place is a hive of scum and villainy!

    • http://twitter.com/lunamagazine Luna Magazine

      We all know someone who’s been hit or started on whilst out, but it isn’t really a big enough issue to place these sorts of sanctions on the entire crowd in general!

      Perhaps they need to isolate the problem areas and do something about those. Or find a solution that works. This one is set to create more problems than it solves.

      • Walter

        If we *all* know someone whose been hit doesn’t that just affirm how pervasive alcohol fuelled violence is across the ‘entire crowd’?

        • Walter

          who’s*

          Goddamnit.

        • http://twitter.com/lunamagazine Luna Magazine

          The city is a melting pot of subcultures Walter, and Adelaide is small, most people know each other (particularly those that are regulars at particular venues), and that’s what the reference to ‘we all know someone’ was about. Surely you’ve heard many a story of a ‘friend of a friend’ who was assaulted whilst out and about- but the issue is not in the clubs itself, it’s on the street. If there are thousands pouring out at the same time, the issue’d be multiplied.

          For those of us who have been going out regularly for several years now, the amount of time that violence has been an issue is minimal, and usually isolated to particular areas.

  • Lamar

    the alcohol tax was actually a commonwealth government scheme… just saying.

  • Bo-Tarah Rose

    I have mixed feelings on this topic. On one hand, I almost feel like the SA Government is having yet another, “I am the law” moments but on the same hand I can see why the idea was put forward. As stated in a previous comments, I think it’s likely that the rowdiness on our streets seems escalated due to the size of Adelaide in comparison to the the growing number of club goers . I’ve lost count of how many times I have gone out only to meet someone who tells me we share mutual friends. That being said I fail to see how dictating what time people should stop drinking is going to solve anything. The ONLY way these drunken brawls and idiotic behaviours will cease is if the Government completely outlaws alcohol and any other kind of known stimulant all together and we all know that will never happen as this is would be extremely dictator-ish of our Governmental leaders not to mention unfair to those of us that do go out and behave in an acceptable manner. It’s so sad because at the end of the day, it is a small number of our population ruining it for everyone else. Another great post Sean